IBIS Macromodel Task Group Meeting date: 29 May 2007 Members (asterisk for those attending): * Ambrish Varma, Cadence Design Systems * Arpad Muranyi, Intel Corp. Barry Katz, SiSoft * Bob Ross, Teraspeed Consulting Group Doug White, Cisco Systems Essaid Bensoudane, ST Microelectronics Ganesh Narayanaswamy, ST Micro * Hemant Shah, Cadence Design Systems * Ian Dodd * Joe Abler, IBM * John Angulo, Mentor Graphics John Shields, Mentor Graphics Ken Willis, Cadence Design Systems * Kumar, Cadence Design Systems Lance Wang, Cadence Design Systems Luis Boluna, Cisco * Michael Mirmak, Intel Corp. * Mike LaBonte, Cisco Systems * Mike Steinberger, SiSoft Patrick O'Halloran, Tiburon Design Automation Paul Fernando, NCSU * Radek Biernacki, Agilent (EESof) * Randy Wolff, Micron Technology Ray Comeau, Cadence Design Systems * Richard Ward, Texas Instruments Sanjeev Gupta, Agilent Shangli Wu, Cadence Stephen Scearce, Cisco Systems Syed Huq, Cisco Systems Syed Sadeghi, ST Micro * Todd Westerhoff, SiSoft Vikas Gupta, Xilinx Vuk Borich, Agilent Walter Katz, SiSoft -------------------------- Call for patent disclosure: No one declared a patent. ----- Opens: - Listwide Outlook calendar event: - Mike LaBonte "owns" a recurring Outlook event that was sent to the list - Call info is out of synch with Arpad's weekly invitations - We decided to drop the Outlook event - Individuals can create their own calendar entries AR: Mike drop Outlook event for these meetings ------------- Review of ARs: - Arpad: Review the new macro library files. - TBD - Arpad: Write parameter passing syntax proposal for a possible BIRD - TBD - EDA vendors clarify "electrically isolated" in BIRD - TBD - Arpad and Michael get specific data on the non-linear behavior problem - Just got a slide set - Still need to determine what can be shared - Todd will send his presentation - Done ------------- New Discussion: Review of Todd's slides for DAC IBIS summit - Slides 3 & 4: - Seemingly inconsistent use of "Characterization" and "Analysis" - Slide 8: - Doesn't clarify that output buffer can be non-linear while channel and RX are LTI - Same point as slide 5: where is the boundary between LTI and NLTI? - The perception is that everything in the green box is "linear" - What are the sources of non-linearity? - Mike S: DFE is inherently non-linear, involves quantization. - Slide 6: - Change title to "Serial Link Modeling Assumptions" - Slide 1: - Fix the date - Add presenter name - IBIS-ATM group should be listed as producer - Company logos will be on one "contributors" page - Kumar: We should not assume that what is passed to GetWave() is LTI - Slide 18: - Ambrish asked if Waiting to develop sample models may slow us down. - Should there be a time limit? - Michael M suggested that the sample doesn't have to be complete or work perfectly. - Todd was concerned that without a concrete example, discussion at the IBIS forum will take us back to square one. - Only a simple model is needed. - We decided to target Sep 2007 for prototype readiness - Prototype and open forum discussion might happen in parallel - We set a June 2007 target for BIRD completion AR: Todd update summit presentation based on feedback Discussion of proposed BIRD: - Michael M commented on BIRD text formatting: - IBIS syntax should be formatted like - Might be section 6c, 6e, or 10 - Arpad: should we show units for some parameters? - Ian would prefer to handle units with an optional keyword - Length is an issue too. - IBIS has been based on SI - We need to either follow IBIS conventions or say what we are doing. - This will be addressed in the EDA meeting the Monday after the summit - Arpad: confusing between pulse response and impulse response - BIRD calls for impulse response only Next meeting: 12 June 2007 12:00pm PT